May 2013

President's Message May 2013

By Ed Haskell

Over the course of the past year there have been many references to the Automation Committee. I want to bring you up to date on what is happening with automation.

The project to automate one or more of our observatories is segmented into several phases. Phase One is nearing completion. The deliverable for Phase One encompasses interfacing the 16” Meade to a control system that operates the telescope remotely as well as opening and closing the slide off roof, running an Ethernet cable underground from that observatory to the Meeting Hall, interfacing that cable to a control system to which is attached the projector, and then projecting the images from the 16” onto the screen in the Meeting Hall.

At this writing all of the required tasks have been tested individually. Over the course of the next several weeks integration testing and adjustment will be accomplished and a demonstration will be performed at the May or June meeting.

At the conclusion of Phase One it will be possible for a room full of members and guests to simultaneously see what the 16” Meade sees. Imagine no longer standing in line!

This new facility may change the way we do Open nights in fundamental ways. For example, presently if the sky is overcast, or worse, we cancel the public viewing. With some advance thought it should be possible to stay open and give the public the major part of what they need to experience, in that visitors can be shown the instruments and then taken to the Meeting Hall where they see a recording of what they would have seen in better weather.

Now many of us are purists and feel that nothing can replace the experience of viewing through the eyepiece. Perhaps this is so, but when the public shows up in a driving rainstorm (believing that our telescope must surely be powerful enough to pierce the clouds!) we will not have to turn anyone away disappointed.

Once this facility is operating there is a long list of benefits to the membership which will be possible which are only a dream at present. I will cover some of those benefits in a subsequent President’s Letter.

The Automation Committee is jointly chaired by Steve Siok and Tom Thibault. They continue to look for additional members to get involved.

Thanks for all you do for Skyscrapers.

May 3: Monthly Meeting

How did Mercury form? New constraints from the MESSENGER mission

William Vaughan

Mercury's high mean density implies that this planet has a disproportionately large metal core. What accounts for this unusual interior structure? Maybe Mercury's outermost rocks have been stripped or scorched away, or maybe Mercury is made of different stuff than the other planets. Such simple explanations have been complicated by geophysical observations from the Mariner 10 mission as well as geological and geochemical results from the ongoing MESSENGER mission. The exciting new results from MESSENGER (and the exciting old results from Mariner 10) will be reviewed in the context of Mercury's genesis.

Will Vaughan is a graduate student in planetary science at Brown University. Will's interests include the Moon and Mercury.

M104: The Sombrero Galaxy

M104: The Sombrero Galaxy

: By Glenn Chaple
One of the more noteworthy examples of an edge-on spiral galaxy bisected by a dark dust lane is M104, the Sombrero Galaxy. The nick-name arises from the galaxy’s resemblance to the traditional Mexican headwear, the bright nuclear bulge forming the hat and the spiral arms/dust lane the wide brim.

May's "Meteor-ocre" Shower

: By Dave Huestis
The May Eta Aquarid meteor shower is one of the best displays of shooting stars during the year. Unfortunately not here in the northern hemisphere.

Help us complete our archives...

Do you have any anecdotes, personal stories, meeting notes, photos, or any other experiences you would like to share?